Sunday, November 23, 2014

My mother and her sort-of legacy...


It’s been about nine months since my mother died. The tides that have turned in my mind since then aren’t significant in themselves. At first I felt she was watching me from above, but that lasted one afternoon. I don’t really “believe” in an afterlife, so the sense of being spied upon faded quickly. Now I must figure out why she DID believe, and I don’t— despite her best efforts and prayers. Is it something I lack? Or did she lack something? Was there a void she had to fill?
After the first purging of junk mail and papers from the boxes in her room (my task upon my first visit to the old house after her death) I had second thoughts. Wouldn’t it be amazing to compile a list of all the Catholic charities that had solicited her contributions (sometimes successfully)? The list would read like a found poem. I could still throw out the envelopes and papers, but I could write down the names of the organizations— “The Society of Saint Gertrude the Great,” for instance. But I didn’t. My task would have taken too long, and I was in a hurry, although I’m not sure why. I guess I wanted to make my visit fruitful by at least eliminating all the cardboard boxes from the room, leaving just the dresser drawers and file cabinet (also filled with papers and junk mail).
Then my brother Michael came in (the one closest to me in age, who was my pal when we were young). I gestured to papers, correspondence, hand-written diatribes in half-filled journals about changes in the Catholic Church. “It was her life’s work,” he said. That statement horrified me, as if I had been throwing out my mother’s personhood. I ended up stuffing my backpack full of the more interesting correspondence and journal entries, and bringing it back to Alabama with me. I am thinking about writing a book.
What I can’t get a grip on is the distance, the discrepancy, between my non-belief and her belief. She was a person who lived every moment (apparently) wishing and hoping that Christ and/or God (the Trinity is a puzzling doctrine) would punish all transgressors ASAP. And transgressors included not only the usual violators of all Ten Commandments, but priests and popes who had changed Catholic rituals she’d grown up with. In one of her writings, she is aghast that wooden pews have been replaced with cushioned pews, and bowing substituted for one-knee genuflection. She called it “anathema.” She abhorred change. The 1960s was not a good time for a person like this to be raising children. All of us must have, at various times, terrified, tortured, and deeply disappointed her simply by being who we were, and by falling under the influence of "modernism," aka "Satan."
I apologized to her on her deathbed (she couldn’t talk back intelligibly, probably because of a stroke) for putting her through all that. And I thanked her for helping me out of a few bad situations. But just as it had been at my Aunt Josephine’s deathbed when my aunt turned to me and asked, “So, what about religion?” I was unable to reassure either of them that I believed in God or Jesus or Mother Mary (although Mary is a pretty cool figure to contemplate). To my aunt I could only repeat, “We really can’t know, can we?” I don’t remember what I said to my mother, who was unable to ask. Probably nothing. But I couldn’t lie. I'd told her my views in letters. I couldn’t pretend. Why couldn’t I at least pretend? And, digging slightly deeper, why couldn’t I actually BELIEVE? I don’t even know whether I’m GLAD that I cannot believe, or profoundly sad about myself in that respect.
So many people believe, or say they do. However, I've not met anyone who believed like my mother did. My mother refused to attend my brother’s wedding--even though it took place in a church--because it wasn’t Catholic (neither was his bride). My mother refused to allow the father of my sister’s children to stay in her house, even though they’d traveled all the way from Spain to introduce her grandchildren to her (they weren’t married at the time).
My mother walked a multi-strand tightrope of religious principles all her life. She welcomed suffering of all kinds (refusing to have a gallbladder operation that would have alleviated months of ensuing pain (the gradual cessation of which she called a “miracle” although it might have been her gallbladder simply ceasing to function).
My mother, the good Catholic woman, refused to use birth control, and thus had many children, some of whom I'm sure neither she nor my father were ready for, emotionally or financially. My father did not share her beliefs, although he went through the motions, something for which she never forgave him; he was a deceiver.
No one but a saint could have believed as firmly and deeply as my mother did. I think she WAS aiming for sainthood of a sort. But she left me a puzzle. And I need to solve it. I’ve already thought of a title for my book: “Momya: The Story of a Believer and Her Wayward Daughter.” What do you think? Catchy?

Tuesday, March 18, 2014

She's gone...the most influential person in my life...


My mother just died. Yes, she up and died. Why did she do such a thing? Well, her body was exhausted, after 90 years of living. She’d had six children, a few of them quite challenging to raise. She’d been associated with a husband (my father) who perhaps did not satisfy her needs (and I don’t mean sexual, but simply a strong, involved, male presence capable of relating emotionally). Not that there is anything wrong with my father. He was a great provider with very interesting ideas and interests. My sister quite likes him. I found him wanting. I needed his attention when I was a teen and did not get it. So I paid him back, I guess. He spent money he did not have on my counseling and etc. But, back to my mother.
I was fortunate to see a lot of her in the last five or six years. When she started inviting me to her funeral, I guess I started visiting a lot. Twice a year at least. Since I live 900 miles away, that was an effort. Not a huge effort, but an effort. And there was more affection than usual. Quite odd for our family. Maybe she actually loved me! Maybe I actually loved her!
It was a wonderful thing that all six of her children could be with her about two weeks before she died. She was on hospice care at home. I arrived about two hours after she’d been brought home from the hospital, having gone into hip surgery able to speak, and having come out not able to speak. I do not know why this was; perhaps another mini-stroke. She’d already had two. AND breast cancer. AND a heart attack. She was a trouper. She was strong. But no one is infinitely strong.
The strange thing is, I’d broken my own pelvis after a fall...just six weeks before that. My mother was worried about me. But I recovered. She did not. I was at her side when she was pretty conscious for a few days after returning from the hospital. I told her I was sorry for the trouble I’d given her as a teenager. I told her lots of things. I am not sure they were the things she wanted to hear.
The love between us seemed to suddenly come into view in the last few years. It wasn’t always visible. There was so much anger, especially on my part. She was always a lot stronger than I was, and always worried and giving advice. I remember when I came home from a car trip to Maine and back to visit friends. I had driven it straight; it wasn’t THAT long a drive. She remarked that I should have taken a rest stop. I responded with fury. That was in 1980, so long ago. Since then I’ve felt more and more tenderness for her.  And I’ve realized she felt that for me.
So, what do I do now? I think the only thing I have learned, which I suspected all along, was that everyone has a reason, and everyone is struggling. In some ways, my mother (partly because of her religion) seemed sure of herself, psychologically. When she became physically weaker I was able to give her something, perhaps. I have realized that she cared about me in a primal way; it has nothing to do with competing philosophies. At what level do I want to live and experience things? If I stick to the basic level, I was loved by her. Yes, I was. And that is good to know.

Saturday, July 13, 2013

Weak sisters...?

“You can’t do this to me! I love you!” Ellen’s voice carried through the apartment to my bedroom down the hall. Chip was breaking up with her. She had been foolish to think it would last. He had just divorced, and I had needed a roommate. He had picked her up on the Wellesley College campus by sitting on a bench looking forlorn in his dark trenchcoat, his black hair hanging in his face bad-boy style, his mouth humorous, expressive. Ten years older than Ellen, probably, and in need of some solace, I’m sure. He hadn’t talked to me much about his divorce from his French wife. They had a child, a girl, two years old. It must have been difficult for him to pull himself away from his daughter.

Ellen was plump, juicy, and innocent. Her greetings to me at the apartment were always cursory; she was there to have sex with Chip. I felt no sympathy now as she cried out in the throes of realizing that was all he’d wanted, although perhaps I should have. The whole thing had lasted three weeks, and they’d been very noisy. I supposed he was a good lover, but I didn’t need to be kept awake every other night. My “medicinal” apricot brandy and milk helped, but I didn’t like being reminded that I myself had been similarly innocent, vulnerable, and infected with romantic expectations.

Perhaps things are different in the 21st century, and women don’t automatically feel they are in “a relationship” that has facets other than sexual (when those facets aren’t actually manifested). “I know he loves me. I can see it in his eyes,” says one stereotypical young woman in love.  “He hasn’t said anything about it, but I have this feeling we will be together; I have this feeling I will have children with him someday,” thinks another. Perhaps these (hypothetical and historical) young women know that if they'd said anything explicit about these notions to the lover, they’d be confronting him with the prospect of lying to continue pleasant sexual activities. So the women keep silent, hoping, expecting. "If I feel so strongly about what’s happening, he must, too!" And the delusion continues until it's shattered.

It’s happened to me. True, it was long ago, but I get reminders every now and then, sometimes from female students I deal with at my job, sometimes from women friends who should know better. I also get reminders that it’s not as easy for some males as it was for Chip, whose slender good looks and naturally sardonic delivery of self-deprecating jokery touched by sadness from big, brown, half-closed eyes made him self-aware bait. Yes, there are young men, too, who have problems merely getting started. Their heartbreak is non-specific. Loss seeps into their lives from an imagined lonely future. But that’s not what I’m talking about right now.

I cried Ellen's way too once, to someone over the phone with whom I’d lived. I imagined that we were still together (despite our separation while he recovered from a minor motorcycle accident). When he told me he was now with someone else, I felt helpless, abandoned. “But what am I gonna doooooo?” I wailed, even though I had a roof over my head, competent roommates, a job, and some comforting pets. The person with sexual “responsibility” for me was relinquishing that responsibility. I was lost. I had suddenly lost my sexuality and my romantic role. Why did that mean more to me than anything else at that time?

My subsequent involvement with a man had an even more painful demise, since I again delegated sexual responsibility to the guy, eventually ascribing some very bad behavior on my part to his influence. When he left, I had to take a unrosy look at myself.

Maybe it was the way girls were raised in the 1950s and 1960s that made us vulnerable to putting all our “eggs” in one basket, I don’t know. I wish I’d known that I was fine as I was, whether or not I was in a “relationship.” I wish I had been taught that sexual feelings were OK, and didn’t need to “belong” to one man, necessarily, at least in youth and young adulthood. I couldn’t even feel that I had any sexuality at all when I was alone, and we now know that’s not right!
Do girls these days have it easier? Of course heartbreak still exists, for women and men. But I don’t know if there’s that feeling of the bottom dropping out of life itself when a lover leaves; that cry to which I eventually became unsympathetic and cold, even toward myself and my long-ago weaknesses: “You can’t do this to me! I love you! What am I gonna dooooo?”
Shape up, woman! Shouldn’t a loving relationship be a want rather than a need? The whipped cream on the top of an already delicious life? Why were we—are we—so friggin’ WEAK?




Sunday, May 20, 2012

I have not much to say. My inner life has been damped down, compared to, well, when I was in my twenties, when that was all there was. OKAY, I’ve accepted the importance of the outside world, including society and particular other people. Fine. My last remembered dream consisted of my trying to arrange some kind of “tour” for a bus driver; people had signed up but not everyone was boarding the bus. I don’t even think I was making any money from this deal, only trying to get a task completed. Sounds familiar. Will visiting a “hippie” friend in Tennessee cure this? I doubt it. But it’s a start. Some much-touted psychic will do “reiki” upon me (although I’ve not felt the need for this). I will meet alternative-type folks. But how can I respect them? Do they have any involvement in the dominant economical processes? How is “New Age” and “Catholic” different? Don’t both posit another (unseen) world that can be dealt with and investigated and profited from? The thing is, I used to be a “hippie.” It was only a refuge, though. And I met its challeneges. I got an “A” in Urban Hippie Life 101. I should have continued my course of study, but for some reason I desired to make a living the usual way. My bad.